Why we don’t need a Han Solo movie
ShareAll sharing options for:Why we don’t need a Han Solo movie
- Twitter (opens in new window)
- Facebook (opens in new window)
- Linkedin (opens in new window)
- Reddit (opens in new window)
- Pocket (opens in new window)
- Flipboard (opens in new window)
- Email (opens in new window)
Right, I know many people may disagree with this, but I have no clue why there is a Han Solo movie in the works.
Out of the Star Wars legacy that has been created since A New Hope was unleashed on the public, I have no idea why they are choosing such an uninteresting character to base a two-and-a-half hour film on. I must admit, I did not like The Force Awakens, mainly because it was a carbon copy update of the original film. Originality is the staple of films and it always should be.
What annoys me more is what Disney have done to Star Wars, it is wrong. They released Rogue One and there is nothing I can do about that, but it DIDN’T NEED TO BE MADE.
What the multi-million dollar company is doing is milking the brand as much as they can, oh how I wish that The Last Jedi will be a triumph for the entire series, but I seriously have my doubts.
Here is a list of films they should’ve made before Han Solo:
Bobba Fett
Obi Wan
Count Dooku
Even effin Jar Jar
I have no idea why they have chosen a character that has such a boring back story, even though *Force Awakens spoiler* that happens, they are moving down the wrong path. Even though die hard Star Wars fans enjoyed the past two films, Disney need to be original and inventive, following the extended universe may help!
Sorry fanboys, but for the first time in my life I disagree.
Discussion feed